[UKUUG-Announce] BSC - OSSG events: Adoption of Open Source across HM Government – London 22/02/11 and 01/03/11

Jane Morrison office at ukuug.org
Wed Feb 9 11:33:56 GMT 2011


Please see below two events organised by the Open Source Specialist Group 
(OSSG) http://ossg.bcs.org that considers adoption of Open Source across HM 
Government. 

These will be held at the BCS Central  London  Offices, First Floor,  The 
Davidson Building, 5 Southampton  Street,  London WC2E 7HA
 (http://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/london-office-guide.pdf)) on:

Tuesday 22nd February 2011, and Tuesday 1st March 2011 both from 1800 to 2100.

These bookable events are free and open to all with buffet and refreshments. To 
book a place to attend please contact:

Mark Elkins via mark_elkins at bcs.org

A member of the Home Office IT Team is undertaking research in conjunction with 
the Cabinet Office to:
(1) try and understand why Open Source is not represented better across HMG 
and the wider public sector, and
(2) identify and address barriers to adoption of Open Source across HMG and 
the wider public sector.

Context

1. The Coalition Government believes Open Source Software can 
deliver significant short and long term cost savings      across 
Government IT.

2. Typical benefits of Open Source include  lower procurement 
prices, no license costs, interoperability, easier integration and 
customisation, compliance with open technology and data  standards 
giving autonomy over your own information and freedom from vendor      
lock in.

3. OSS is not currently widely used in Government IT, and the 
leading systems integrators for Government  Departments do not 
routinely consider open source software for IT solution  options, as
 required by existing HMG ICT policy.

4. There are significant and wide ranging  obstacles to Open 
Source in Government. Some of these are lack of  procurement 
guidance, resistance from suppliers, concerns about license      
obligations and patent issues, and a lack of understanding of open 
source  maturity and its development ecosystem.

Debates
The debates will focus on (1) understanding the barriers to wider 
adoption of Open Source across HMG, and (2) potential solutions to 
these barriers.

We will aim to have representatives from major IT suppliers to HMG
 to help us understand the barriers from their perspective, and to 
help us understand how well any proposed solutions might work. The 
debates should be more a dialogue with the  IT suppliers than amongst 
OSS supporters.



Evening Debate 1 – Tuesday 22nd February

1. Supplier Challenge – how can we incentivize the traditional IT suppliers to 
consider OSS when evaluation software options?

Suitable OSS is not currently being considered equally  –  why?What are the 
disincentives for IT suppliers? In-house skills. New support relationships 
with OSS vendors and support companies. Any others?If they do work with OSS, 
how can we be sure the cost benefits are passed onto customers?

2. Procurement – how can it be better?
What are the current obstacles? Do the existing contracts and frameworks 
discourage OSS – if so, how?

3. OSS Assessment Model – working with IT suppliers
IT suppliers aren’t very open with how they select software as 
candidates for evaluation – not sustainable when spending taxpayers 
money.We can help make this more transparent by working  with them to 
build an assessment model they can sign up to. What would suppliers like
 to include in this assessment ? I have  started a model to de 
developed. List of top software  per category  (virtualisation, monitoring, 
email, collaboration, etc)  – needs to be maintained to be useful, but 
will get the ball rolling in current lack of knowledge.

4. Case Studies – evidence  of  short and long term value for money. 
Where are these? Also proven examples  of OSS use in high demand, volume
 or availability applications.


5. Other Ideas – especially for the next debate.



Evening Debate 2 – Tuesday 1st March

1. Security. OSS is insecure compared to commercial software?
By what criteria can we select software to minimise security risks?Does OSS 
need a different approach to patching?Can we simply use empirical evidence when 
comparing OSS with closed software? Statistics for internet browsers are 
common – published vulnerabilities, known exploits, time to fixKey question for 
HMG is – all things being equal, open code means vulnerabilities can be 
discovered and exploited before there is time to fix

2. Buy-not-Build. Can OSS actually benefit HMG because HMG doesn’t want custom 
or re-engineered software?

HMG generally asks IT suppliers to build systems from COTS components and 
minimise customisation and re-engineering – it wasn’t want to maintain special 
code because of cost and risk. So does a significant benefit of OSS not apply  
to HMG?

3. Legal advice for OSS
OSS has some unique legal aspects compared with commercial software –
 where to get advice? Myths around legal obstacles and obligations are 
going unchallenged.Patents and liability issues are often raised – resolved by 
major OSS suppliers who will shield customers?

4. Long Term Strategy
OSS won’t happen overnight.Should we work backwards from insisting on open 
information formats for HMG interactions with the public and other sectors? 
This way the use of open standards compliant software filters back into HMG 
organisations.

5. Other Ideas





      


      
-------------------------------------------------------

-- 
UKUUG Secretariat
PO Box 37
Buntingford
Herts SG9 9UQ
Tel: 01763 273475
Fax: 01763 273255
office at ukuug.org
www.ukuug.org

A Company Limited by Guarantee

Registered Office:
The Manor House
Buntingford
Herts SG9 9AB

Reg. No. 2506680



More information about the Announce mailing list